That trendy March Madness upset pick that everyone is talking about? Well, they may be a better selection than you think. We break down why.

Ah, it’s the most wonderful time of year. The 2025 NCAA Tournament bracket is out, causing friends and family and coworkers across the country scrambling to make (and, in some instances, re-make) their March Madness selections.

Naturally, one of the major talking points leading up to first-round action is identifying which teams are capable of pulling off upsets. There are two lines of thinking here: Should you go with the school that everyone else is selecting? Or do you go against the grain and take the team less chosen?

Given the general unpredictability of the NCAA Tournament — where the odds of a perfect bracket are 1 in 9.2 quintillion — even “consensus” picks are hardly a given this time of year.

More Heat Check CBB:

It begs the question: Just how good is the general public at picking upsets? The answer may surprise you.

The chart below shows the average pick rate for each first-round upset since 2013, based on historical data from ESPN and Yahoo! Sports. For our purposes, when public confidence in a given upset is one standard deviation higher than average pick rate for its seed line, it is considered a “consensus” pick. The overall winning percentage of the lower-seeded team over that span is also included.

UpsetPublic Pick Rate“Consensus” Pick Rate ThresholdWinning Percentage
11 over 631.9%42.0%52.3%
12 over 524.8%33.4%38.6%
13 over 413.1%18.7%20.5%
14 over 38.1%11.5%15.9%
15 over 24.1%5.5%11.4%
16 over 12.6%3.5%4.6%

Note just how often those 11-over-6 upsets have been happening over the past decade and change. That’s where we begin our dive into how the public has performed with its consensus upset picks.

11-over-6

Upset PickPublic Pick RateFirst-Round Result
2022 Michigan56.0%W, 75-63 vs. Colorado State
2022 Virginia Tech52.5%L, 81-73 vs. Texas
2013 Minnesota48.4%W, 83-63 vs. UCLA
2024 Oregon47.5%W, 87-73 vs. South Carolina
2016 Gonzaga47.3%W, 68-52 vs. Seton Hall
2024 New Mexico47.1%L, 77-56 vs. Clemson
2015 Texas44.9%L, 56-48 vs. Butler
2024 NC State43.6%W, 80-67 vs. Texas Tech
2017 Xavier43.5%W, 76-65 vs. Maryland
2014 Tennessee43.3%W, 86-67 vs. UMass

The 11-vs.-6 matchup has been nearly a coin flip in recent years, with the 11-seed actually holding a slim 23-21 lead in the first round of the NCAA Tournament since 2013. In large part, the “consensus” 11-over-6 upsets have performed very well with seven of the 10 picks ultimately coming to fruition — the only exceptions being 2022 Virginia Tech, 2024 New Mexico and 2015 Texas. Of the consensus upset picks that panned out, all but one hailed from a power conference (save for Gonzaga, which is its own powerhouse).

12-over-5

Upset PickPublic Pick RateFirst-Round Result
2021 Georgetown42.9%L, 96-73 vs. Colorado
2017 Middle Tennessee42.9%W, 81-72 vs. Minnesota
2019 Murray State42.3%W, 83-64 vs. Marquette
2013 Oregon41.7%W, 68-55 vs. Oklahoma State
2014 NC State40.3%L, 83-90 vs. Saint Louis (OT)
2019 Oregon39.1%W, 72-54 vs. Wisconsin
2023 VCU34.5%L, 63-51 vs. Saint Mary’s

Everyone’s favorite upset pick, the 12-over-5, has rendered strong results as well. This is where the mid-major sweethearts start to get involved. Since 2013, the “consensus” 12-over-5 pick has hit four out of seven times, as compared to just a 38.6% hit rate for all 12-seeds (17 upsets out of 44 games). Among the popular and memorable mid-majors in this group is Ja Morant’s 2019 Murray State squad. The Oregon Ducks have also made two Sweet 16 runs from this spot, and much of the public seemed to see it coming.

13-over-4

Upset PickPublic Pick RateFirst-Round Result
2022 South Dakota State31.2%L, 66-57 vs. Providence
2022 Vermont23.3%L, 75-71 vs. Arkansas
2021 Ohio23.2%W, 62-58 vs. Virginia
2019 UC Irvine21.4%W, 70-64 vs. Kansas State
2016 Hawaii21.2%W, 77-66 vs. California
2023 Kent State21.1%L, 71-60 vs. Indiana

The 13-over-4 upset pick has become more popular of late with four “consensus” choices since 2021. While the winning percentage of 13-seeds since 2013 is 20.5%, the “consensus” picks have gone 3-3 (50.0%). This is where we can see the public getting a little overconfident, though. For instance, nearly a third of the country bought into South Dakota State’s top-ranked 3-point shooting in 2022 — only to watch Providence hold the Jackrabbits to 57 points in just the second game of the Thursday slate. A lot of brackets went into the wastebaskets very early that year.

14-over-3

Upset PickPublic Pick RateFirst-Round Result
2017 FGCU18.6%L, 86-80 vs. Florida State
2019 Yale17.2%L, 79-74 vs. LSU
2021 Colgate15.4%L, 85-68 vs. Arkansas
2013 Davidson14.3%L, 59-58 vs. Marquette
2018 Stephen F. Austin13.5%L, 70-60 vs. Texas Tech
2017 New Mexico State11.9%L, 91-73 vs. Baylor
2022 Colgate11.6%L, 67-60 vs. Wisconsin

While the 14-over-3 “consensus” choices haven’t yet yielded an upset, there have been many close calls. FGCU had a late first-half lead in 2017 and kept things close, Yale made it interesting late in 2019 against LSU, and Davidson had a seven-point lead over Marquette with 1:49 left in 2013, only to lose by one. Since 2013, 14-seeds have defeated 3-seeds 15.9% of the time — but all of those upsets have been relatively unexpected to this point.

15-over-2

Upset PickPublic Pick RateFirst-Round Result
2023 Vermont8.1%L, 78-61 vs. Marquette
2023 Colgate6.8%L, 81-61 vs. Texas
2023 Princeton6.4%W, 59-55 vs. Arizona
2018 Georgia State6.4%L, 68-53 vs. Cincinnati
2021 Iona6.1%L, 68-55 vs. Alabama
2021 Grand Canyon5.8%L, 86-74 vs. Iowa
2023 UNC Asheville5.7%L, 86-53 vs. UCLA

The 15-over-2 upset has become more common in recent years (11.4% winning percentage since 2013). Perhaps that shouldn’t be surprising given that three different 15-seeds have made Sweet 16 runs since 2021, including Saint Peter’s and its miraculous trip to the 2022 Elite Eight. However, the public has only struck on its consensus picks once in seven tries, when 2023 Princeton knocked off Arizona. The other picks haven’t been very competitive, although Iona and GCU kept it within 15 during the 2021 tournament.

16-over-1

Upset PickPublic Pick RateFirst-Round Result
2017 South Dakota State4.3%L, 66-46 vs. Gonzaga
2023 Northern Kentucky4.2%L, 63-52 vs. Houston
2023 Howard4.1%L, 96-68 vs. Kansas
2018 Penn4.0%L, 76-70 vs. Kansas
2022 Norfolk State3.8%L, 85-49 vs. Baylor
2021 Drexel3.7%L, 78-49 vs. Illinois
2017 Texas Southern3.6%L, 103-64 vs. North Carolina
2023 FDU3.5%W, 63-58 vs. Purdue
2022 Georgia State3.5%L, 93-72 vs. Gonzaga

Until 2018, the 16-over-1 upset seemed like it would never happen. Now, with 2018 Virginia and 2023 Purdue both falling to 16-seeds in recent tournaments (and then reaching the national championship the following year) the next one feels like a matter of when and not if. Even still, picking a 16-seed in your bracket isn’t a great strategy, as tempting as the lifelong bragging rights may be if it were to happen. Perhaps the 3.5% of folks who rolled the dice on FDU would feel differently.

Takeaways and 2025 outlook

Overall, the general public is pretty good at picking upsets. Out of the 46 total “consensus” picks above, 16 became eventual upsets, good for a 34.8% success rate. Based on the winning percentages of these various matchups since 2013, the “expected” number of upsets out of these 46 picks was just 11.5 (24.9%). As a result, “consensus” upset picks by the general public are 39.1% more likely to pay off than their less popular counterparts.

Nicely done, America!

Turning the page to the 2025 tournament, there is just one “consensus” upset pick as of Monday evening: 13-seed Yale over 4-seed Texas A&M. According to Yahoo Sports, 20.9% of brackets have Yale advancing, which would make it the seventh-most picked 13-over-4 upset since 2013. If you’re still on the fence about that one, it might worth taking the plunge and jumping on the bandwagon.

Discover more from Heat Check CBB

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading